PCN vs. ^GSPC

In the year-to-date period, PCN achieves a -0.80% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 0.51% return. Over the past 10 years, PCN has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 7.96%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 10.85% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current PCN Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is comparable to the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCN and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

The maximum PCN drawdown since its inception was -61.14%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCN and ^GSPC.

The current volatility for PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN) is 2.61%, while S&P 500 (^GSPC) has a volatility of 4.77%. This indicates that PCN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.